I’m not politically minded, but I’m writing a new book series called “Quandaries of a Conqueror.” It focuses on global geopolitics. I discuss Africa’s role in the future of climate change. It seems very simple when you delve into this topic. Once you start researching, you find yourself down a hellish rabbit hole. Like, why are immigrants from Africa called migrants, but immigrants from the West are called expats? No one wants to discourse this racist coincidence, although it appears very convenient.
As the slogan says, the “land that we love…”
We are living in a world where the “good guys” claim to stand for justice and equality. There will be clear suspicions of double standards and cases of gross abuse of power. The West has turned to financial abuse as one of its age-old strategies. The question always arises as to who is the bad guy since there is little difference between the good and bad guys. In some cases, the standout type turns out to be extremely cruel, but fear of his financial abuse forces the masses to ignore their corruption.
I had closed my Facebook page to focus on the project I was developing. Then I heard there was fighting in Sierra Leone. As the slogan says, the “land that we love” was in trouble. I logged in to see if people were okay. The impoverished people of Sierra Leone were now at risk of entering another war. We know that the previous war was about the country’s natural resources. What else could this recent unrest be about? Everyone wants to discuss a dissatisfied opposition party and a rogued election.
Do West African general elections violate the will of their voters, whom no one cares about? Absolutely! Corruption in the African elections exists, but assuming the West cares about that is nonsense. The average Sierra Leonean cannot get a visa to emigrate to the West. Chinese ships steal fish from the sea and starve the population of Sierra Leone. If there’s one thing I know for sure, the West doesn’t care about Sierra Leone, except for her natural resources, which they wish to extract for free.
There are several Kimberly red tapes in that direction.
I remember when President Maada Bio became president. One of his steps was a visit to the Antwerp Diamond District. How do they regulate the sale of African diamonds without input from African governments? One buys a diamond for $1,000 in Sierra Leone and sells it for almost $50,000 in Antwerp. Yet, Sierra Leone can’t sell its diamonds. Middle Easterners traded the minerals with Europeans there. The method excludes the Sierra Leonean government from the transaction process.
The propaganda says that the only wrong person in this scenario is the African who shows up to trade his diamond. There are several Kimberly red tapes in that direction. How is the Sierra Leonean government supposed to lift its people out of poverty if it cannot regulate the price of its minerals sold worldwide? As I compiled my research for the next book series, I could tell all black people that Africa will never overcome racism if we do not first unite against the global propaganda that sustains it.
Yes. I declare that slavery and colonialization were acts of racism. So is the neo-colonization that’s taking effect now. In another book where I discussed how feminism deploys a similar tactic as racism, I defined racism as genetic warfare against Africa. It’s a psychological, chemical, and genetic war that is rooted in the West’s gross disrespect for the African people. That is probably why they and everyone else, including India, Asia, South America, and the Middle East, have global propaganda in place.
Everyone knows it shouldn’t be happening.
Collectively, the world has decided to reduce the status of people of African descent, which is the psychological part of the war. But before we go blaming the West for its countless atrocities and disrespect against black people, we must ask ourselves why it is so easy for the West to manipulate people with mass information. You can see the proof of this in marketing. That is the main issue here. The propaganda would never work if so many people were not easily controllable with the information.
Look at the ridiculous war in Ukraine. Everyone knows it shouldn’t be happening. We reprimand Russian “violations” of “innocent” Ukrainians while the media ignores the violations on the Ukrainian side. First, their president claims to be patriotic but is willing to allow a war to start on his territory. Second, we have blatant racism, where many countries have openly treated Ukrainian refugees and migrants far better than refugees and migrants from other war-torn regions like Syria, for example.
Third is the mistreatment of Ukrainian men whom their government forces to enlist to fight in the war with Russia. Many of these Ukrainian men are matched to their deaths. Some have drowned while swimming across a river to Poland or Romania, hoping to avoid death on the battlefield. Do you remember feminism and its strong argument about gender equality? The freedom of choice. Why is the West, which has been the proponent of feminism, supporting a nation that only drafts its men into war?
Why is everyone still rocking with that war?
Of course, I don’t want any army to recruit little girls to fight battle-hardened Russian commandos in a losing combat. I’m simply pointing out the hypocrisy as the media glosses over these issues. Isn’t that one of the hidden reasons for that war? The West wants to give the traditional people of Eastern Europe secularism, which is against their predominantly Christian Orthodox culture. Still, Russia has opposed the spread of Western ideology and propaganda in that region. And the West has insisted on it.
The global media has failed to report this part of the story. Why this? Why is everyone still rocking with that war? Russia has refused to allow the psychological shift that the West, mainly the United States, wants to influence in that region. These views have their root in Judeo-Christianity. And ironically, the West claims to be the unwavering ally of the Jews. Right? We love the Jews, but only if they adopt secularism. Okay, you may think I’m crazy, so let’s shift to the war between Israel and Palestine.
Who does not see that Israel takes the same position as Russia in this conflict? If Israel is doing the same thing in Palestine that Russia has done in Ukraine, then how come the West defends Ukraine but not the Palestinians? Do you see how racism reappears in the story? The psychological war has suddenly become genetic as well. Please tell me if I’m wrong when I say today’s Israel is more European as a nation than Israel, the original people of Abraham. This Israel is secular. It does not fight against the spread of cultural norms that Judaism blatantly rejects. Isn’t that disjointed?
Antisemitism and racism are the same.
Instead, the West has said it’s combating “terrorism.” When you look at the news, you see women and children bombed. The West speaks; everyone must agree, or Facebook will punish you. Stepping back to view the bigger picture of Western propaganda, we notice that the elected officials seem to ignore the will of their populace while using the media to inject buzzwords into the public’s psyche. What are these words? Terrorism, migrants, sex trafficking, thugs, misogyny, antisemitism, etc.
As much as the media want the public to take the government’s side when they accuse others with these words, they never react the same way to stop racism as they do to these other buzzwords. Hence, Middle Easterners traded the country’s natural resources with Europeans in Sierra Leone, leaving the Sierra Leoneans out of the transaction process. There is far less financial abuse against those who purport racism than those who purport antisemitism when antisemitism and racism are the same.
Ask yourself, how is antisemitism different from racism? I will bet the answer is the same as why the word migrant differs from expat. It boils down to genetics. Although we live in an information age where disagreements are based on differences of ideas and cultural norms, the media does not discuss the other side’s point of view. Instead, it demands retribution for those who express an opposing point of view by using these buzzwords to bastardize them, further justifying the abuse of those people.
Therefore, as they defined it, we must not discuss what Russia or Palestine wants, even though Ukraine and Palestine are much more aligned than Russia and Israel when looking at the psychosocial and cultural perspective of each conflict. Those who speak out directly against the side supported by the mainstream media often face Nazi-style retribution. That brings me to my other observation. The West defeated Hitler and the Nazi Party, but did it destroy all of the Nazi’s strategies and technologies? Why not?
Interestingly, there is less racism against people of African descent in Russia than in Ukraine, where the mainstream media has conveniently failed to report the many cases of overt racism during this war. When I hear about shooting and fighting in Sierra Leone, I automatically assume that there has been a disagreement over natural resources. Relatively speaking, the West and the Middle East are taking those natural and mineral resources for free while leaving the people to languish in poverty.
You hear about coups and wars whenever someone asks them to pay a fair price for what they take. Is it because the West and the Middle East cannot afford to pay a reasonable price for African mineral and natural resources? I don’t think so. The United States has demonstrated that by giving ten billion dollars away to Ukraine. The reason why European or Middle Eastern companies refuse to pay a fair price for African mineral and natural resources is racism. They have no respect for Africans, which is what is reflected in the largely unchecked racism against people of African descent across the globe. Lastly, this racism would never exist if it was antisemitism.*