Many men believe there’s ongoing systemic warfare against traditional masculinity and straight men. Some speculate how this war has reached a global frontier. They have accused the mainstream media. There are also various government summits, such as the G or others, like the C, L, and S, Summits, etc. On the internet, the global emasculation and sometimes alienation of traditional male views birthed a community known as the “Manosphere.” But the mainstream community stubbornly refuses to address problems like misandry. It rejected this so-called manosphere that blames feminists for propagandizing women against the traditional family.
Or why does the mainstream media promote contempt…
This manosphere has pointed out several biased social norms against men. As an example, they cite family court rulings that favor women. The people of the manosphere believe that feminists obscure the truth with political correctness. They also resent the mainstream community’s public tarnishing of men’s reputations. Men who follow manosphere ideology cannot understand why the authorities have tilted the laws and policies in their society in favor of feminists. Or why does the mainstream media promote contempt against straight male sexuality or conventional families? As a result, the manosphere has identified its primary enemy.
Feminists have the full leeway of the global mainstream media to spread their ideology. They reason that systemic feminism and the media hatefully mislabel straight men with “hate speech,” “sexism,” or “hatred of women.” It’s radical feminists who are xenophobic toward masculinity. The authorities relegate the manosphere to the internet, which their hackers disconnect from search engines. Men have accused many journalists of bias when covering this gender war—the all-powerful feminist establishment vs. the underdog community, the manosphere—usually, the mainstream media resorts to bastardizing the manosphere’s most popular influencers.
The manosphere has been here for over a decade. Most of its “content creators” use personal resources to sustain their platforms in a fight to uphold traditional gender creeds. Opponents often spread unfounded allegations against them using buzzwords such as “sex trafficking,” “rape,” “harassment,” “human trafficking,” or “misogyny” to trigger uproar over these men with traditional masculine behavior. The manosphere introduced phrases like “simping,” “modern women,” “beta males,” or “high-value men.” This manosphere has produced some of the most luminous arguments against the systemic and global normalization of feminism and feminist values.
Feminists have been so equipped in this gender war that many people believe…
Of course, this hasn’t gone without an endless spate of back and forth between them and feminists. Feminist vigilante groups and supporters have called for the de-platforming of various manosphere content creators, which include Andrew Tate. They have celebrated the death of those who have died, for example, Kevin Samuels. It’s an outright war of angry words between the sexes, with countless double standards tipped in favor of those who take the radical feminist stance. And to be honest, the feminist side of this war seems more armed. In my personal opinion, I believe that the mainstream media is made up of shameless pathological liars.
Feminists have been so equipped in this gender war that many believe there’s an “agenda” against men. Feminists have laws and policies on their side, law enforcement agencies, governments and corporations, educational systems, financial resources, and the mainstream media. They even go so far as to undermine religious tenants. Why would all these significant institutions and bodies enthusiastically government attack masculinity and traditional male values? Speaking of religion, the root of the manosphere’s conventional family values stems from monotheism, while feminist values stem from secularism. That’s what the media won’t tell you.
This brings us to Greta Thunberg, portrayed by mainstream media as a climate change sweetheart. Given how much the media has tarnished the character of many men, their praise of Greta is not shocking. As she has often spoken to girls of the younger generation, many in the manosphere believe that Greta is simply a mascot for radical feminists dressed as climate change fighters. As a traditional community, manospheric men do not think children should make life-changing decisions. If climate change were a severe issue, Greta Thunberg would need experience before stepping onto a global platform with that much clout to speak about the subject.
The question is, who put her in a position to pass radical feminism on to our children? At this point, Andrew Tate, who puts too much stock in materialism, would challenge Greta to a Twitter debate to see if she’s worth her salt in the knowledge of climate change. But… true to her feminist nature, Greta goes straight for misandry when confronted with masculinity. Immediately afterward, the global media celebrated the man’s hatred and disrespect by going viral with the misandry. After all their jazz about misogyny, the media and feminists confidently basked in their double standards, like once the script was changed to misandry, it was business as usual.*