Situations like the cover-up of Jeffrey Epstein’s shadowy legacy are some of the reasons for my aversion to geopolitical debates. For me, most people are unaware of what is truly happening. This lack of information makes democracy appear to be a façade. Genuine democracy requires citizens who actively participate in shaping their future by directly influencing laws, procedures, decisions, and policies. Instead, governments or their officials often conceal the truth behind a veil of secrecy. They control the narrative they share. Even if you succeed in belling the cat, you still face the challenge of catching and restraining it if you’re the mouse.
The only action the mouse can take is to flee, which it has already done… really, there’s no hope! All jokes aside, the authorities reveal only what serves their interests. They conceal critical details that would enable informed public participation. This mind-blowing opacity transforms any purported democratic governance into a thinly veiled autocracy. Like an oligarchy where the ruling elite dictate, while the populace submits. I accepted this reality some decades ago. Complete submission to governmental authority is the unavoidable condition of all existence. Therefore, engaging in geopolitical discussions is often a paradoxical exercise at the least.
President Trump’s 2024 electoral victory likely stemmed from the populace’s yearning for authenticity, rather than an endorsement of his platform. It was the opposite of President Obama, whose platform we endorsed while misrepresented. Many American citizens are starved for candor in a political landscape of carefully crafted pronouncements. They now perceive President Donald Trump’s presidential campaign as one of refreshing honesty, however flawed. This is the crux of the matter. We, the electorate, are often denied the transparent and comprehensive information necessary for truly informed choices. That means we can never really choose.
If the above statements are factual, then our civic duty, far from being a voluntary act, is a mandatory one. The carceral state serves as a reminder. Dissent from the established power structure is met with brutal suppression, echoing the oppressive mechanisms of historical chattel slavery. The mainstream media, were it to operate solely as a purveyor of entertainment, would eliminate the forum for geopolitical discussion. Yet, even this known revelation, framed for sensationalism, reveals more unsettling truths. The narrative unfolds. We accept government pronouncements as inviolable truth, cascading down through every bureaucratic stratum.
For example, should official pronouncements declare the Gaza situation not a genocide, then so it’s deemed. Similarly, they declared the unavailability of The Jeffrey Epstein List a fact and hope to close the matter. Why? Because they said so. Now, I openly avow my fervent Israelite identity, a descendant of the Tribe of Issachar. I advocate for the reclamation of the ancestral homeland. Israel’s very essence is inextricably linked to this sacred territory. We must repossess the entire realm of the Kingdom of Israel and reconstruct Solomon’s Temple at its ordained location in Jerusalem. My Abrahamic teaching dictates that the prophecy must come true.
Moreover, Yahweh, the God of Israel, is sovereign over judgment. Scripture attests to numerous instances of divine genocide. It even includes the anticipated Armageddon, a cataclysmic conflict foreseen as the ultimate act of necessary genocide. That means, while you might unequivocally condemn the Gaza situation as an act of genocide, we must all acknowledge the binding nature of governmental decrees. If the authorities prohibit the use of the word, then it must be so. Now that’s the mother of teabags! We may never know the truth about what truly happened to Jeffrey Epstein. Therefore, the real Epstein List might never see the light of day.