The information age has reached an exciting point. Do you happen to know whose information we access? The problem is censorship has always been about who’s accepting the news. In my last article, I wrote about how Chris Rock’s latest stand-up comedy show ignited the topic of selective equality and legal corruption. To further illustrate what I meant, I compared it to the Hindu caste system, which divides people into upper and lower classes. The upper caste enjoys more opportunities, privileges, and double standards than the lowest class could imagine. And how that exists under a system that teaches humility and reverence for the divine. Think about Tupac Shakur’s song where he asked if heaven’s got a ghetto. Is this why we have all these independent content creators today?
They’ve translated it into 70 languages and published the report globally.
Regarding censorship, the public, those people who Facebook refer to as their “community,” have complained and called out social media and the mainstream for broadcasting worldly beliefs. Some say they share half-truths and are practically fraudulent regarding information. Social media created its caste system with checkmarks for celebrity and corporate-related accounts. Then they render the average creator’s account damn near somewhat dormant simultaneously. The mainstream media shuns the public’s objections about them and persists in shoving ideas down the throats of viewers who don’t want to consume those ideas. They don’t give a shit! It’s like strapping someone to a gurney face down and forcing them to take a cold enema they’ve repeatedly said they don’t want.
So… people went and created their independent platforms and used them to share the truth. Since then, an information war has been raging. Meanwhile, most people agree that if any platform must be censored today, it is the mainstream media. They are the ones who flood the public’s sphere with information that people may not believe or agree with in any way, shape, or form. Did something happen in California last night? Within minutes people are reading about it in Europe. They’ve translated it into 70 languages and published the report globally. Then local reporters regurgitate it. Go to France, and their reporter is regurgitating. Go to Spain, and the Spanish reporter is regurgitating. The German reporter also repeats the same information, spreading the same announcement to billions.
Did the majority of those very busy people ask for this info? No! So, why inform them? The media bombards us with messages we care less about whenever we open our phones or browse social media. We have feminist writers teaching us what they think we should accept. We receive unsolicited data about transgender sentiments. WOKE content is in articles, ads, celebrity rumors, etc. Dating sites with disabled men’s profiles. We experience these situations regardless of whether they go against our cultural, religious, or ethical values. However, when an independent content creator provides relevant information to the communities that want their input, elected officials conjure up opposing guidelines. Remember legal corruption? The criminality that involves the people’s legislature.
European feminists also have access to promising careers
Let’s break this down a bit more. Today’s taxpayers have no superiority in determining where elected officials spend their tax money. Elected officials will pass regulations and then use the methods of crooks to move the goalpost to avoid complying with them. One could compare the double standard with proposed domestic gun laws that seek to disarm law-abiding citizens while arming law enforcement in the teeth. Why would law enforcement still need their guns if we disarm the civilians? Or the Democrats’ proposal for taxpayers to forgive student loans aimed at young feminists in debt. They did not use their student loans to study anything related to science, technology, engineering, or mathematics. The high-priced educational institutions sucked up the student’s loan money.
After completing a master’s degree, students cannot access the American dream as single women. Debt buries them. They only have an expensive degree that makes them middle-class civil servants. The liberal wing of government, therefore, suggests withdrawing this mounted debt at the taxpayer’s expense. It prevents young feminists from getting together with men to find traditional families. Many say liberals push an anti-traditional family agenda. Is it still speculation? As a side note: some of what I’m saying may be over your head if you’re reading this article outside North America. For example, many European countries have affordable or accessible university education for their citizens. European feminists also have access to promising careers when they graduate.
If that’s you, then you might misunderstand my implications. I also think European communities disapprove of misandry as much as misogyny, homophobia, or transphobia. They enforce their laws precisely in a well-balanced system. That’s why it worries me when Europeans and Africans get North American news so quickly. I also experience them in a pseudo-cultural conviction as Europe works to uphold its values of traditions. I’m not about resisting change. Instead, I’m about not falling into what the President of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers calls a “global totalitarian biotech state.” We understand selectivity if we turn our lenses to Chris Rock’s stand-up comedy show Selective Outrage. That outrage is akin to double standards, justifiable bigotry, or legal corruption.
Rock jested about many serious topics, although the mainstream media swept them under the rug by emphasizing the part about Jada Pinket-Smith cheating on Will Smith. In the video above, elected officials bullied a teenager in a Catholic school for daring to speak the truth to power. Why? We live in a time when people prefer facts. Discrimination against transgender people is wrong. And it’s also true that the Bible does not condone transgender-ism. We have two truths in one situation. Why would a transgender student overstep the Bible while attending a Catholic school? Why should a student have to highlight that? These are realities, but there can only be one. So, whose truth is truth? If we dismiss holy scriptures, archaic laws, and traditions, who gets to decide what’s authentic and what isn’t?
Elected officials ignore calls from the majority of voters.
Who gets to choose what’s good for us and what isn’t? Elected officials or the majority vote? Doesn’t it become totalitarian when one person or group chooses on everyone’s behalf when others cannot exercise the same liberty? Where will the buck stop if we continue to bend the rules and standards to extend new privileges against earlier norms? How long before they clear the path to pedophilia? Should elected officials solve this annoyance on their own? Our democratic system dictates that the majority rule. Forget ancient Greece. Our leaders plan to rewrite new guidelines and force us to follow them. They want to create algorithms that hide independent content from the public, but there’s no discussion of censorship or restricting mainstream media’s immediate access to the world.
Mainstream media can bombard us with overwhelming amounts of unsolicited information on social media, cell phone internet, computer networks, and television. It doesn’t matter if we want to hear the announcement, allow it, or if it’s detrimental to our beliefs, culture, religion, or values. In most instances, once we have this information, we cannot do anything to change what they’ve reported. As long as they see fit, we have no choice but to consume it. In the meantime, they also mislabel and censor information providers that we like or want to listen to, removing it from our reach before we even know it exists. This is a modern democracy. It is a media caste system that the mainstream dominates. Elected officials ignore calls from the majority of voters. *